Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (supplement) 2008 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
This experiment was carried out to investigate the effect of
harvesting frequency on yield and nutritive value of cassava
foliage. It was arranged in a Randomized complete block design
(RCBD). Two treatments were two different ages of cassava foliage
of initial harvesting, at 2 and 4 months; (IC2) and
(IC4). The subsequent harvestings for both were at every
2 months until the cassava foliage was 8 months old. Cassava
(Rayong 5, RY5) was cultivated as a monoculture for all
plots; each plot was 5x10 m (50 m2), and 150 kg/ha of
commercial fertilizer (46-0-0, N-P-K) was applied to cassava crop
at the start.
The results showed that cassava foliage yield was significantly different (P<0.05) among harvesting times within the treatments. For the initial harvesting at 2 months of age (IC2), DM yield was highest in the second harvest (H2) and was lowest in the fourth harvest (H4) (3.2 and 1.2 tonnes/ha, respectively). For the treatment of initial harvesting at 4 months of age (IC4), DM yield was greatest in the first harvest (H1) (3.3 tonnes/ha) and was lowest in the third harvest (H3) (1.2 tonnes/ha). The foliage yield at each harvesting time significantly decreased (p<0.05) with the crop age. However, total DM yield was not significantly different among treatments. Total DM yields of IC2 and IC4 were 7.1 and 6.5 tonnes/ha, respectively. The fiber contents, NDF, ADF and ADL, were significantly (p<0.05) higher in IC4 than IC2, especially in the first harvest (H1) (56.4, 37.5 and 14.6%, respectively). In contrast, CP was significantly higher in IC2 (21.5%). Based on this study, it is concluded that different initial harvesting of cassava foliage at 2 months (IC2) and 4 months of age (IC4) had no major affect on the quantity of the foliage, with yields of 7.1 vs 6.5 tonnes/ha, respectively, but affected the chemical composition of cassava, especially of CP (21.5% vs 20.5%) and NDF (48.1% vs 52.4%), respectively.
Keywords: Cassava foliage; initial harvesting; cassava hay production; chemical composition
Cassava or tapioca (Manihot esculenta, Crantz) is an annual tuber crop grown widely in tropical and sub-tropical countries. This plant is well known for adaptation to poor soil conditions, to be drought resistant and to be pest tolerant (Chantaprasam and Wanapat 2003). Several varieties of cassava are found in Lao PDR, including ordinary cassava, red cassava, yolk cassava, Japanese cassava, mottled cassava and the animal feed cassava (Biodiversity Country Report 2003). Generally, cassava is a crop traditionally grown for root production. Cassava root is regarded as a reserve food for people because it is an excellent energy source, and leaves are available as crop residues when the root is harvested (Vongsamphanh 2003). Cassava foliage is one of the most important crops for farmers, because it contains a high content of proteins. According to Allen (1984) cassava leaf has a high crude protein (CP) concentration (16.7 to 39.8% CP) which consisted of various essential amino acids in proportions close to those of soybean meal(Atchara Limsila et al 2002). However, the intake and digestibility could be low due to the high level of condensed tannins (Reed et al 1982; Onwuka 1992).
Recently, several researchers have paid attention to cassava in integrated crop-livestock farming systems in several Asian countries. Preston (2002) reported that new research information about the use of cassava foliage as animal feed is becoming available. The potential use of cassava hay (combined leaves, stems and petiole) was reported by Wanapat et al (1997) and then by Wanapat (2000a; 2000b), who also reported that planting cassava for hay making aimed to increase digestible biomass. In addition, cassava tubers contain high levels of starch while the leaves have been used as a high protein source when collected at tuber harvesting time (Wanapat 2001). Alternatively, systems for making hay from cassava foliage by harvesting the whole upper green part at early growth stage (3-4 months), and every 2-3 months subsequently until one year by cutting the whole crop at 30 cm above ground could reduce the condensed tannin content and increase the protein content (25% of DM), resulting in a higher nutritive value (Wanapat 2003). Cassava can also be managed as a semi-perennial crop with repeated harvesting of foliage at 2-3 month intervals (Preston and Rodríguez 2004). It is very important that new high-yielding cassava varieties and highly effective cultivation technologies are developed (Wenquan Wang 2002).
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of initial
harvesting of cassava foliage at 2 and 4 months, and subsequent
harvestings at 2 months until 8 months of age, on cassava hay yield
and chemical composition under the rain-fed conditions of Lao
PDR.
Location
The experiment was conducted at the Livestock Research Center (Nam Xuang), 44 km from Vientiane City, Lao PDR, under rain fed conditions on a sandy loam soil. The pH of the soil was 4-5. There are two seasons, dry (November-April) and rainy (May-October). The average temperature was approximately 27oC. The experiment was started in March 2006 and finished in January 2007.
The experiment was arranged in a Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 2 treatments and 6 replications. Cassava was cultivated in monoculture for all of the plots and each plot was 5x10 m (50 m2). The experiment consisted of the following two treatments:
Soil was ploughed by using a tractor to break down the soil structure without harrowing. The area was divided into 12 plots. The size of each plot was 5x10 m. Rayong 5 [RY5] was cultivated in monoculture at the beginning of the rainy season (March). Cassava stems were used at length of 15-20 cm for planting with 90x60 cm spacing in each plot. Weeding was done monthly and commercial fertilizer (46-0-0 of N-P-K) was applied initially and after at every harvest (150 kg/ha).
Initial harvesting of cassava foliage was done at 2 months (IC2) and at 4 months (IC4) of growth. The subsequent harvest was done at every 2 months of growth until the foliage was 8 months old. Cassava foliage IC2 was harvested 4 times and IC4 was harvested 3 times. Harvesting of IC2 treatment was at 2 months when the plants were 90-120 cm in height. They were harvested at 40-50 cm above the ground, and treatment of IC4 was harvested when the foliage was 150-180 cm in height, cutting at 90-100 cm, only green part of foliage. The cassava foliage comprised young stems, leaves and petioles. They were harvested between 08:00h - 10:00h to avoid yield fluctuation. The foliage was measured for fresh yield in individual plots.
The samples 1 kg were randomly sampled of each plot and divided into two parts, one for separate proportions of leaves, petioles and stems, and the other for analysis of dry matter (DM), ash and crude protein (CP), according to (AOAC 1990). Neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), acid-detergent fiber (ADF) and acid-detergent lignin (ADL) were determined by the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970). Condensed tannins (CT) in cassava hay were analyzed by the Vanillin-HCL method (Burns 1971 modified by Wanapat and Poungchompu (2001).
Data were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) according to RCBD using the General Linear Model (GLM) of Minitab Software Version Release 14 (2003). Treatment means that showed significant differences at the probability level of (P<0.05) were compared by using Tukey's pairwise comparison procedures. The following model was:
Yij = µ +Bi + Tj + Eij
Where:
Yij = Observation in block i (I=1-6) and treatment j (j=1-2),
µ = Overall mean,
Bi = Block effect,
Tj = Treatment effect,
Eij = Error.
Leaf accounted for a higher proportion than petiole and stem of the whole crop. Within initial harvesting of cassava foliage at 2 months (IC2), the highest DM yield was 3.2 tonnes/ha, obtained at second harvesting (H2) while within initial harvesting of cassava foliage at 4 months (IC4) it was 3.3 tonnes/ha, obtained at first harvesting (H1). Highest total yield was found at IC2 compared with IC4 (7.1 vs 6.5 tonnes/ha) (Table 1).
Table 1. Effect of harvesting time on cassava foliage yield |
||||||||||
|
IC2 |
Total |
IC4 |
Total |
SEM |
|||||
|
H1 |
H2 |
H3 |
H4 |
H1 |
H2 |
H3 |
|||
-------------------------DM yield, t/ha------------------------ | ||||||||||
Leaf |
0.6de |
1.9a |
0.8c |
0.5e |
3.8 |
1.4b |
1.2b |
0.7cd |
3.2 |
0.15 |
Petiole |
0.2c |
0.5a |
0.3b |
0.2c |
1.2 |
0.5a |
0.3b |
0.1c |
0.9 |
0.06 |
Stem |
0.3e |
0.9b |
0.6c |
0.4de |
2.2 |
1.5a |
0.5cd |
0.3e |
2.3 |
0.15 |
Total |
1.1c |
3.2a |
1.7b |
1.0c |
7.1 |
3.3a |
2.0b |
1.2c |
6.5 |
0.35 |
a,b,c Means in the same row with different
superscripts differ (P<0.05). |
|
Figure 1. Comparison between initial harvesting of
cassava foliage at 2 and 4 months |
Crude protein contents were similar under each initial harvesting, ranging from 19.7 - 22.2% but were significantly different between IC2 and IC4 (21.5 vs 20.5%, respectively). The fibrous fractions, NDF, ADF, ADL were found to be different (p<0.05) under each initial harvesting and especially when compared between two initial harvesting times (IC2 and IC4). It was apparent that initial harvesting at 2 months resulted in lower contents of all fibrous fractions (Table 2).
Table 2. Effect of harvesting time on chemical composition of cassava foliage |
|||||||||
|
IC2 |
|
IC4 |
SEM |
|||||
|
H1 |
H2 |
H3 |
H4 |
|
H1 |
H2 |
H3 |
|
DM, % |
90.3 |
92.1 |
93.2 |
93.9 |
|
92.7 |
90.5 |
90.8 |
0.05 |
% in DM |
|||||||||
Ash |
6.6 |
6.6 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
|
7.3 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
0.07 |
CP |
21.8 |
22.2 |
21.4 |
20.4 |
|
19.7 |
20.8 |
21.1 |
0.17 |
NDF |
48.4ab |
47.1a |
49.3b |
47.5a |
|
56.4c |
50.8b |
49.9b |
0.04 |
ADF |
29.8a |
30.3ab |
30.6ab |
31.5b |
|
37.5c |
32.0b |
30.8ab |
0.19 |
ADL |
10.5b |
11.1b |
10.5b |
10.9b |
|
14.6a |
11.8b |
10.6b |
0.03 |
CT |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
|
3.3 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
0.03 |
a,b,c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05). H1 = Cassava foliage (CF), first harvest., H2 = CF, second harvest., H3 = CF, third harvest, H4 = CF fourth harvest. |
Economical returns of cassava foliage are shown in Table 3. The total expenditures for IC2 and IC4 are significantly different. Treatment IC2 resulted in higher expenditure compared to IC4 (1,693 and 1,451 USD), respectively. The costs of cassava hay for IC2 and IC4 were not significantly different, 0.2 USD/kg of DM. However, cassava foliage at IC2 had a higher quality, because of higher levels of protein and lower levels of fiber.
Table 3. Effect of harvesting time on cassava foliage yield and economical returns |
|||
|
IC2 (4 cuttings) |
IC4 (3 cuttings) |
SEM |
Cassava foliage DM yield |
|
|
|
kg/ha |
7083 |
6483 |
301 |
Expenditure (USD/ha) |
|
|
|
Soil preparation |
246 |
245 |
1.03 |
Planting |
285 |
285 |
0.96 |
Weeding |
486a |
366b |
0.98 |
Fertilizer |
486a |
364b |
1.05 |
Harvesting |
126 |
125 |
0.74 |
Drying |
64.5 |
65.7 |
1.08 |
Total expenditure (USD/ha) |
1693a |
1451b |
2.93 |
Cassava hay cost (USD/kg) |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.01 |
a,b,c Values on the same row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05). |
|||
USD = United states of dollar; SEM = Standard error of the mean. |
|||
IC2 = Initial harvesting of cassava foliage 2 months, and subsequent harvesting every 2 months until 8 months. |
|||
IC4 = Initial harvesting of cassava foliage 4 months, and subsequent harvesting every 2 months until 8 months. |
In the current study, initial harvesting of cassava foliage at 2 months (IC2) and at 4 months (IC4) showed that total dry matter yield ranged from 7.1 to 6.5 tonnes/ha, respectively, but was not significantly different between IC2 and (IC4. These results agreed with Wanapat (2001), who found that the DM yield of cassava hay ranged from 2-8 tonnes/ha, depending on variety, cultivation practice and use of fertilizer. This is in contrast with results from the study of Chantaprasarn and Wanapat (2003), who demonstrated that DM yield of cassava foliage ranged from 0.3 to 4.0 tonnes/ha when harvested at 3 months after planting under traditional cultivation. DM yield of both treatments was slightly higher than the value obtained by Khang and Preston (2005a) who reported a cassava foliage KM94 dry matter yield of 4.3 tonnes/ha. A similar result was also obtained by Duong and Preston (2005), who found that dry matter yield of cassava foliage was increased from 4.3 to 5.4 tonnes/ha when the cassava was fertilized with effluent at 5 tonnes DM/ha. Poungchompu et al (2001) also reported that DM yields were relatively high (3.6 to 4.4 tonnes/ha) for 3 cuttings, with a first harvest at 3 months after planting and every 2 months thereafter, and with planting on ridges and manure application.
The results in the present study were basically lower than the finding of Wanapat et al (2005), who reported that cassava production without legume intercropping and with cowpea, Stylosanthesguianensis and Phaseoluscalcaratus intercropping produced 12.6, 10.9, 11.4 and 11 tonnes DM/ha of cassava foliage, respectively. DM yield of cassava foliage was significantly reduced by subsequent harvesting and with the age of the cassava plants. This finding is in agreement with Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004), who showed that yield of RY72 and a local variety was linearly decreased with harvest time after planting, and Chantaprasarn and Wanapat (2003), who showed that cassava foliage yield was increased by frequent harvesting intervals. A similar result was also obtained by Sinthuprama et al (1983). Plant spacing and frequency of cutting have been shown to have a significant effect on the combined yield of cassava (Petlum et al 2001). However, cassava foliage yield when harvested at 2-month intervals could be maintained over a 2 year period when goat manure or bio-digester effluent was applied at the rate of 180 kg N/ha after every harvest (Preston 2001). There are several possible explanations for this result on the different yields of cassava foliage, such as it differences in study site, seasonal conditions, planting space, fertilizer management, subsequent harvestings, and differences in variety (Gomez and Valdivieso 1984; Simwambana et al 1992). Fertilizer management can affect foliage yield, as reported by Molina and El-Sharkawy (1995), as can the factor of age at first cutting and interval between cuttings (Lockard et al 1985; Simwambana et al 1992; Tung et al 2001; Hong et al 2003).
The present results show that leaf proportion ranged from 46.4 to 48.5% when harvested at IC2 and IC4, respectively. However, these values were lower than the results of Meyrelles et al (1977), who found the leaf proportion of cassava foliage was 52%. In addition, leaf proportion was higher when the crop was fertilized with effluent from a bio-digester, and ranged from 60 to 66% (Khang and Preston 2005a). This finding agrees with Nguyen Phuc Tien et al (2003,) who showed that leaf proportion of cassava foliage associated with Flemingia ranged from 60 to 63%. It has been found that cassava hay harvested at 4 months after planting had a leaf proportion of 61.6% (Wanapat 2002).
The present results concerning the chemical composition of cassava hay are in agreement with those from Khang and Preston (2005a; 2005b), who reported that CP content in cassava foliage ranged from 18.7 to 20.5% when intercropped with Flemingia, and from 18.6 to 20.7% with application of effluent from a bio-digester. In present study, CP content in cassava foliage ranged from 19.7 to 22.2%. Wanapat et al (1997) reported that the CP value in cassava hay (whole crop) was 24.9%, compared with 20.6-22.0% CP in the study of Poungchompu et al (2001). These results were lower than the values obtained by Kiyothong and Wanapat (2003), who found that CP content ranged from 21.6 to 21.9% in cassava hay as sole crop. Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004) also found that CP ranged from 22.6 to 25.8% when harvested at 3 month intervals, and Wanapat et al (2005) reported cassava foliage intercropped with legumes had a protein content that ranged from 20.2 to 24.1% CP in the first and second year, respectively.
Concentrations of the fibrous components of cassava hay, NDF, ADF and ADL were 48.1, 30.5, 10.7 and 52.4, 33.4, 12.3% when harvested at IC2 and IC4, respectively. The values of NDF, ADF and ADL in this study were higher than those reported by Chantaprasarn and Wanapat (2003), and than those obtained by Man and Wiktorsson (2001; 2002). NDF content ranged from 35.3 to 37.6% when foliage was grown with and without effluent applied (Khang and Preston 2005a). It can be suggested that when cassava was grown as monoculture, the fibrous fraction was slightly higher compared to cassava intercropped with legumes, and that the differences were probably due to differences in harvesting time.
Condensed tannins (CT) in cassava hay harvested at
IC2 and IC4 were from 3.6 to 3.5%,
respectively, and tended to decrease with subsequent harvestings.
These results are in agreement with those (3.4%) of Vongsamphanh
and Wanapat (2004), and are slightly lower than the values obtained
by Poungchompu et al (2001) and Kiyothong and Wanapat
(2003). The level of condensed tannins in the present study tended
to decline with frequent harvesting, and was similar to the values
obtained by Hong et al (2003). Wanapat (2002) also reported
that CT was generally higher in mature cassava leaves than in
cassava hay harvested at a young growth stage. However, a level of
CT of between 2-4% is considered to be favorable for ruminants as
rumen by-pass protein (Wanapat 2001). If the level of CT in the
feed exceeds 6% of dry matter, it will reduce feed intake and
digestibility (Barry and Manley 1984).
Based on this experiment, it can be concluded that different initial harvesting intervals of cassava foliage affected chemical composition, but not the quantity of cassava hay.
Early initial harvesting of cassava foliage showed that the crude protein content tended to be higher and fibrous fractions lower in IC2.
Further research should be carried out on factors affecting the yield of cassava foliage and feeding method in different farming systems.
It would be interesting to assess the effects of
intercropping with legumes, and to consider integrated
crop-livestock systems in terms of animal manure application to
improve cassava foliage yield on-farm.
The author would like to express most sincere thanks to the
Swedish International Development Agency (Sida), Department for
Research Cooperation with Developing Countries (SAREC), through the
MEKARN regional project for funding this thesis research, and to
the National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI),
Livestock Research Center (LRC) and Tropical Feed Resources
Research and Development Center (TROFEC), Department of Animal
Science, Faculty of agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand for
permission to use research facilities and for their cooperation.
Allen R D 1984 Feedstuffs ingredient analysis table, Feedstuffs (USA), p.25-30
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis. Association of official analysis (15th edition). Washigton, D.C, U.S.A
Atchara Limsila, Saowaree Tungsakul, Wattana Wattananont, Attapon Boonsing, Somyot Pichitporn and Howeler R H 2002 Cassava Leaf Production Research in Thailand. Cassava Research and Development in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proceeding of the Seventh Regional Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand.
Barry T N and Manley TR 1984 The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus peduculatus for sheep 2. Quantitative digestion of carbohydrate and protein. British Journal of Nutrition 51:493
Biodiversity Country Report 2003 Ministry for Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Lao PDR. Science Technology and Environment Agency, Vientiane, Lao PDR
Chantaprasarn B and Wanapat M 2003 Effects of different harvest intervals on cassava foliage (cassava hay) and root yield. Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC) Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. http://www.mekarn.org/msc2003-05/theses05/chan_p1.pdf
Duong Nguyen Khang and Preston T R 2005a Effect of effluent from low-cost plastic film biodigester on yield and chemical composition of cassava foliage and tuber yield. Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle) MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May, 2005. Article #6. Retrieved, from http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/khan6.htm
Duong Nguyen Khang and Preston T R 2005b Effect of association of Flemingia (Flemingia macrophylla) on chemical composition of cassava foliage, total yield of foliage and yield of cassava roots Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle) MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May, 2005. Article #6a. Retrieved, from http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/khan6a.htm
Goering H K and Van Soest P J 1970 Forage fiber analysis. ARS. Handbook N. 379. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Gomez G and Valdivieso M 1984 Cassava for animal feeding: effect of variety and plant age on production of leaves and roots. Animal Feed Science Technology 11: 49-55
Hong N T T, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C, Pakdee P and Rowlinson P 2003 Effects of timing of initial cutting and subsequent cutting on yields and chemical compositions of cassava hay and its supplementation on lactating dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 16: 1763 - 1769
Kiyothong K and Wanapat M 2003 Supplementation of cassava hay and stylo184 hay to replace concentrate for lactating dairy cows. Cassava-legume intercropping: A potential feed production system for small holder dairy farming. MSc thesis in the programme "Tropical Livestock Systems". SLU, Dept of Animal nutrition and management, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lockard R G, Saqui M A and Wounuah D D 1985 Effects of time and frequency of leaf harvest on growth and yield of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crants) in Liberia. Field Crops Research 12: 175-180
Man N V and Wiktorsson H 2001 Cassava tops ensiled with or without molasses as additive effects on quality feed intake and digestibility by heifers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 14: 624-630
Man N V and Wiktorsson H 2002Effect of molasses on nutritional quality of cassava and Gliricidia tops silage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 15: 1294-1299
Meyrelles L, MacLeod N A and Preston T R 1977 Cassava forage as a source of protein: effect of population density and age of cutting. Tropical Animal Production 2: 18-26 http://www.utafoundation.org/TAP/TAP21/2_1_3.pdf
Minitab Software Version Release 14 2003 MINITAB® and the MINITAB logo® are registered trademarks of Minitab Inc. Released 14 for Windows®, USA.
Molina J L and El-Sharkawy M A 1995 Increasing crop production in cassava by fertilizing production of planting material. Field Crops Research 44: 151-157
Nguyen Phuc Tien, Ngo Tien Dung, Nguyen Thi Mui, Dinh Van Binh and Preston T R 2003 Improving biomass yield and soil fertility by associations of Flemingia (Flemingia macrophylla) with Mulberry (Morus alba) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) on sloping land in the Bavi area. Goat and Rabbit Research Centre Sontay, Hatay, Vietnam. UTA-TOSOLY, Socorro, Santander del Sur, Colombia. http://www.mekarn.org/sarec03/Tienbavi.htm
Onwuka C F I 1992 Tannin and saponin contents of some tropical browse species feed to goats. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 69:176
Petlum A Wanapat M and Wanapat S 2001 Effect of planting space and cutting frequency on cassava hay yield and chemical composition. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on "Currrent Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed", held in Khon Kean, Thailand. July 23-24, 2001. pp.50-55
Poungchompu O, Wanapat S, Polthanee A, Wachirapakorn C and Wanapat M 2001 Effects of planting method and fertilization on cassava hay yield and chemical composition. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/poun.htm
Preston T R 2001 Potential of cassava in integrated farming systems. In Proceeding of the international workshop on current research and development on use as cassava as animal feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Editors). Khon Kaen University, Thailand. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Preston T R 2002 Production and utilization of cassava in integrated farming systems for smallholder farmers in Vietnam and Cambodia. Cassava Research and Development in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proceeding of the Seventh Regional Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand.
Preston T R and Rodríguez L 2004 Production and utilization of cassava foliage for livestock in integrated farming systems. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (5). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/5/pres16028.htm
Reed J D, McDowell R E, Van Soest P J and Horvath P J 1982 Condensed tannin: a factor limiting to use of cassava foliage. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 2131
Simwambana M S C, Ferguson TU and Osiru D S O 1992 The effects of time to first shoot removal on leaf vegetable quality in cassava (Manihot esculaenta Crants). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 60: 319-325
Sinthuprama S, Tiraporn C and Thongklum A 1983 Planting and management. Cassava monograph number 7. Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 41-56
Tung C M, Liang J B, Tan S L, Ong H K and Jelan ZA 2001 Foliage productivity and growth persistency of three local cassava varieties. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 14: 1253-1259
Vongsamphanh P 2003 Potential use of local feed resources for ruminants in Lao, PDR. Livestock Research Center, National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Vientiane, Lao PDR. http://www.mekarn.org/msc2001-03/theses03/contvong.htm
Vongsamphanh P and Wanapat M 2004 Comparison of cassava hay yield and chemical composition of local and introduced varieties and effects of levels of cassava hay supplementation in native beef cattle fed on rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. No. 55. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/8/vong16055.htm
Wanapat M 2000a Current livestock production and protein sources as animal feed in Thailand. In Proceedings of FAO Expert Consultation and Workshop: Protein Source for the Animal Feed Industry, FAO Animal production and Health Proceedings No 1., Rome. Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5019e/y5019e0d.htm
Wanapat M 2000b Role of cassava hay as animal feed in the tropics. In Proc. Agriculture Conference, Faculty of Agriculture. Chiengmai Universty. Thailand. The National Agriculture Fair, January 27-29.
Wanapat M 2001 Role of cassava hay as animal feed in the tropics. In Proceeding of the international workshop on current research and development on use as cassava as animal feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Editors). Khon Kaen University, Thailand. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/wana3.htm
Wanapat M 2002 The role of cassava hay as animal feed. Cassava Research and Development in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proceeding of the Seventh Regional Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanapat M 2003 Manipulation of cassava cultivation and utilization to improve protein to energy biomassforlivestock feeding in the tropics.Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 16, 463-472
Wanapat M, Petlum A, Joomjantha S and Wanapat S 2005 Legumes intercropping and long-term harvesting of cassava foliage on biomass yield and chemical composition. Workshop-seminar, 23-25 May 2005, MEKARN-CTU. http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/wana4.htm
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A and Boontao U 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 9(2): http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd9/2/metha92.htm
Wanapat M and Poungchompu O 2001 Method for estimation of tannin by vallin-HCL method (2001, a modified method of Burns 1971). Department of Animal Science, Khon Kean University, Khon Kaen 4002, Thailand.
Wenquan Wang 2002 Cassava production for industrial utilization in China. Present and future perspective. Cassava Research and Development in Asia: Exploring New Opportunities for an Ancient Crop. Proceeding of the Seventh Regional Workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanapat M, Petlum A, Joomjantha S and Wanapat S 2005: Legumes intercropping and long-term harvesting of cassava foliage for cassava hay production on biomass yield and chemical composition. Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" (Editors: Reg Preston and Brian Ogle) MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May, 2005. Article #4. Retrieved, from http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/wana4.htm