Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (supplement) 2008 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
The treatments in an experiment with purebred Mong Cai gilts were: TW0: 100% of supplementary protein supplied by soybean meal (no green foliage supplied); TW50: 50% of supplementary protein supplied by soybean meal and 50% by mixture of ensiled taro leaves and water spinach (equal parts of each foliage on DM basis) and TW100: 100% of supplementary protein supplied by a mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach (equal parts of each foliage on DM basis). The basal diet was a 50:50 mixture (DM basis) of ensiled cassava roots and broken rice.
Coefficients of apparent total tract digestibility (CATTD), measured by the acid-insoluble ash method, of dry matter, crude protein, organic matter and crude fibre decreased as the proportion of the mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach that replaced soybean meal increased (P<0.001). There were no differences between the CATTD obtained in late (85 days after service) compared with early (25 days after service) gestation (P>0.05).
It is concluded that digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, organic matter and crude fibre decreased with increased proportions of a mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach replacing soybean meal in a basal diet of ensiled cassava root and broken rice. The limiting factor to the utilization of the taro leaf silage and water spinach appears to be the lower digestibility of the protein. There was no effect of stage of gestation on digestibility coefficients.
Key words: Digestibility, Mong Cai gilts, soybean meal, Taro leaf, water spinach
Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.)Schott) originated in India and South East Asia and is presently cultivated in many tropical and subtropical countries, primarily as a food for its edible corm, and secondarily as a leaf vegetable (http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3647e/W3647E05.htm). The leaves of taro can be made into silage for feeding to pigs (Chittavong Malavanh et al 2008a). Preston (2006) has suggested that the leaves from shrubs such as cassava and mulberry, and from vegetables such as sweet potato and cocoyam, together with water plants such as duckweed (Lemna spp) and water spinach (Ipomeoa aquatica), can be used successfully in diets for pigs, replacing at least half the protein usually supplied as soybean and fish meal. Recent research has shown that the roots and leaves of Giant taro (Alocasia macrorrhiza) can be fed successfully to pigs, provided they are cooked or ensiled (Pham Sy Tiep et al 2006). The leaves of New cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) were successfully fed in the fresh state to pigs in experiments reported by Rodriguez et al (2006 a,b).
Water spinach is a water plant that grows well in the water or in soil. It is cultivated mainly as human food, but is also used as feed for pigs and cattle in Southeast Asia (AFRIS 2005). An important feature of water spinach is its capacity to yield high levels of biomass when fertilized with effluent from biodigesters charged with pig manure (Kean and Preston 2001). The crude protein content in the leaves and stems can be as high as 32 and 18 % in dry basis, respectively (Luyen 2003). Recent research has shown that fresh water spinach was more palatable than cassava leaves for growing pigs, as reflected in higher total dry matter (DM) intake, and the high proportion of the diet (47%) provided by the leaves (Chhay Ty and Preston 2005).
It is important to measure the digestibility of the nutrients in leaves intended for use as pig feed, as the digestibility of crude protein especially may be impaired by the linkages between the protein and cell wall constituents (Jørgensen et al 1996; Kass et al 1980). There is also evidence that the apparent digestibility of fibrous feeds is higher in mature sows as opposed to growing pigs (Varel and Pond 1985).
The aim of this study was to determine the apparent
digestibility coefficients in the early and late stages of
gestation in Mong Cai gilts fed ensiled cassava roots and broken
rice with protein derived from different ratios of soybean meal and
a mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach.
The experiment was carried out in the farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos, located in Xaythani District, Vientiane City, Laos. The mean daily temperature in the area at the time of the experiment was 27 oC (range 22-32 oC).
The experiment was done according to a RCBD Nested design, with five replications of three treatments. There were 2 stages of gestation (early, 25 days after service and late, 85 days after service).
The three dietary treatments were the same as in Chittavong Malavanh et al (2008).
The fifteen Mong Cai gilts were housed individually and were those used by Chittavong Malavanh et al (2008b). In early gestation (25 days after service) the average live weight was 46 kg and in late gestation (85 days after service) it was 68 kg.
Details of feeds and feeding were the same as in Chittavong Malavanh et al (2008b).
Feed and faeces samples were taken over 5 consecutive days in the early and late stages of gestation. On each occasion, samples of faeces were collected daily from the floor of the pens 3 to 4 h after the first feed in the morning and stored at -18°C. At the end of the 5 days the samples were bulked according to individual animals. Feed samples were taken over the same time period.
Feed and faeces samples were analysed for acid-insoluble ash (AIA) according to the method of Van Keulen and Young (1977), for DM by micro-wave radiation (Undersander et al (1993) and N, CF, HCN and ash according to AOAC (1990).
The calculation of the coefficient of apparent total tract DM digestibility was:
DM digestibility (%) = (1- A/B)*100, where A and B are the acid insoluble ash concentrations in feed and faeces, respectively.
The digestibility of other nutrients (X) was calculated as follows:
Digestibility (X in %) = (1- A/B*XB/XA)*100, where XA and XB are the concentrations of X in feed and faeces, respectively.
The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model procedure
of ANOVA in the MINITAB software (version 13.12) (2000). Sources of
variation were stage of gestation, blocks, treatments (diets),
interaction stage*diets, interaction stage*blocks and error.
The taro leaf silage contained 19.2 % crude protein in DM, with similar protein content in the water spinach (18.8 % CP in DM). The chemical composition of the diets and ration formulation are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Table 1. Composition of the vitamin-mineral premix supplied |
|
Item |
per kg |
Vitamin-mineral premix |
|
Vitamin A, million IU |
10.0 |
Vitamin D3, million IU |
2.50 |
Vitamin E, IU |
5000 |
Vitamin K3,g |
1.60 |
Vitamin B1, g |
1.20 |
Vitanin B2, g |
3.20 |
Vitamin B6, g |
1.20 |
Niacin, g |
5.00 |
Pantothenic acid,g |
4.00 |
Folic acid, g |
5.00 |
Biotin, g |
0.12 |
Vitanmin C, g |
30.0 |
Additives and preservatives, g |
12.0 |
Other, kg |
1.00 |
Mineral premix |
|
Manganese, g |
5.40 |
Iron, g |
14.2 |
Copper, g |
1.00 |
Zinc, g |
2.90 |
Sodium, g |
3.90 |
Iodine |
19.0 |
Potassium, mg |
0.90 |
Cobalt, mg |
1.10 |
Other, g |
1.00 |
Table 2. Chemical composition of ingredients, % dry basis |
||||||
Ingredient |
DM |
CP |
CF |
Ash |
Oxalic acid, % |
HCN, mg/kg DM |
Water spinach |
8.19 |
18.8 |
16 |
15.1 |
|
|
Taro leaf silage |
20.2 |
19 |
13.2 |
11.6 |
0.30 |
|
Soybean meal |
87.8 |
41.8 |
8.02 |
7.4 |
|
|
Cassava root silage |
43.7 |
1.12 |
4.12 |
3.5 |
|
325 |
Broken rice |
86.9 |
5.74 |
2.78 |
0.81 |
|
|
Salt |
95.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premix |
98.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Formulation of diets, % of DM |
|
||
Ingredient |
TW0 |
TW50 |
TW100 |
Broken rice |
37.0 |
33.9 |
18.5 |
Cassava root silage |
49.5 |
44.6 |
48.0 |
Taro leaf silage |
0.00 |
7.00 |
16.0 |
Water spinach |
0.00 |
7.00 |
16.0 |
Soybean meal |
12.0 |
6.00 |
0.00 |
Premix |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Salt |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
% Crude protein |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
The protein was supplied almost entirely by soybean meal and the mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach. The proportions of the diet crude protein derived from individual ingredients during the first and last stage of gestation are shown in Figure 1.
|
* WS= water spinach; TLS= taro leaf silage; SBM= soybean meal;
BR= Broken rice and CRS= cassava root silage |
|
Apparent digestibility coefficients of DM, CP, OM and CF declined as the proportion of the mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach that replaced soybean meal increased (P<0.05) (Table 4; Figure 2).
Table 4.
Apparent digestibility coefficients in Mong Cai gilts in gestation
fed diets with different |
|||||
Apparent digestibility, g/kg |
TW0 |
TW50 |
TW100 |
SEM |
P-value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
DM |
900c |
832b |
809a |
2.06 |
0.001 |
OM |
917c |
864b |
837a |
2.40 |
0.001 |
CP |
816c |
655b |
595a |
4.85 |
0.001 |
CF |
623c |
586b |
554a |
5.40 |
0.001 |
a, b Mean values within rows with different superscript letters are different at P<0.05 |
|
|
There were no differences between the CATTD obtained in late compared with early gestation (P>0.05) (Tables 5 and 6).
Table 5.
Effect of stage of gestation on the apparent digestibility
coefficients in Mong Cai gilts fed |
||||
Apparent digestibility, g/kg |
Early gestation |
Late gestation |
SEM |
P-value |
Dry matter |
845 |
848 |
1.68 |
0.235 |
Organic matter |
873 |
871 |
1.96 |
0.480 |
Crude protein |
691 |
687 |
3.96 |
0.471 |
Crude fibre |
588 |
588 |
4.41 |
0.992 |
Table 6. Nutrient digestibility at two stages of gestation in Mong Cai gilts fed diets* in which a mixture of taro leaf silage replaced soybean meal |
||||||||
Digestibility, g/kg |
Early (day 25) gestation |
Late (day 85) gestation |
SEM |
P-value |
||||
TW0 |
TW50 |
TW100 |
TW0 |
TW50 |
TW100 |
|||
Dry matter |
898 |
831 |
807 |
901 |
832 |
811 |
2.91 |
0.845 |
Organic matter |
917 |
867 |
836 |
916 |
860 |
837 |
3.39 |
0.451 |
Crude protein |
814 |
660 |
598 |
818 |
649 |
592 |
6.85 |
0.572 |
Crude fibre |
628 |
585 |
551 |
619 |
588 |
556 |
7.63 |
0.589 |
The extent of the decline in apparent digestibility of DM (from 900 to 809 g/kg) and crude protein (from 816 to 595 g/kg) as the foliages completely replaced soybean meal was similar to the findings of Rodriguez et al (2006) for pigs fed sugar cane juice and fresh leaves of new cocoyam replacing soybean meal (939 to 834 g/kg for DM apparent digestibility and 821 to 614 g/kg for crude protein digestibility). In the present study there was a linear negative relationship between apparent crude protein digestibility and crude fibre in the diet (Figure 3).
|
|
This trend was to be
expected, as the role of dietary fibre in reducing protein
digestibility is well understood (Jørgensen et al 1996; Kass
et al 1980). Ogle (2006) indicated that as well as dietary fibre,
other mechanisms are involved in the reduction in nutrient
digestibility on high forage diets, including level of feeding,
processing of the forage, the age of the pig, increased rates of
passage of digesta as a result of its increased bulk and
water-holding capacity, and irritation of the gut wall mucosa by
VFA produced in the hind-gut. Le Goff and Noblet (2001) reported
that the digestibility of energy increased from 82.1 to 85.2%, of
crude protein from 80.3 to 85.1% and of NDF from 56.3 to 64.4% in
mature sows as opposed to growing pigs. Varel and Pond (1985)
provided evidence that the apparent digestibility of fibrous feeds
is higher in mature sows as opposed to growing pigs. However, it
would appear that in our study the difference in age (from early to
late stage of the first pregnancy) was not sufficiently large to
have been a factor influencing digestibility, as there were no
differences in digestibility coefficients between these two
stages.
We are very grateful to the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Department for Research Cooperation (Sida-SAREC) through the regional MEKARN Project, for the financial support of this study.
We would also like to thank the Faculty of
Agriculture, National University of Laos for allowing and helping us to carry out this
experiment. The authors thank Mr Bounlerth Syvilai for analytical
assistance in the laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture.
AFRIS 2005 Animal Feed Resources Information System, FAO, Rome. Retrieved June 7, 2005, from http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/afris/default.htm
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th Edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230
Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2005 Effect of water spinach and fresh cassava leaves on intake, digestibility and N retention in growing pigs; Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May 2005 http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/chha26.htm
Chittavong Malavanh, Preston T R and Ogle B 2008a Ensiling leaves of Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Shott) with sugar cane molasses. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, Article #79. Retrieved , from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/mala1.htm
Chittavong Malavanh, Preston T R and Ogle B 2008b Effect of replacing soybean meal by a mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach on reproduction and piglet performance in Mong Cai gilts. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, Article #80. Retrieved , from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/mala2.htm
Le Goff G and Noblet J 2001 Comparative total tract digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unite Mixte de Recherches sur le Veau et le Porc, St Gilles, France. Journal of Animal Science 79:2418-2427 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/79/9/2418
Jørgensen H, Zhao X, Eggum B O and Zhao X Q 1996 The influence of dietary fiber and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 75: 365-378
Kass M L, Van Soest P J, Pond W G, Lewis B and McDowell R E 1980 Utilization of dietary fiber from alfalfa by growing swine. I. Apparent digestibility of diet components in specific segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Animal Science 50: 175-181 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/50/1/175.pdf
Kean S and Preston T R 2001 Comparison of biodigester effluent and urea as fertilizer for water spinach vegetable. Livestock Research for Rural Development. (13)6: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd13/6/kean136.htm
Luyen L T 2003 Effect of the urea level on biomass production of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) grown in soil and in water. MEKARN Mini-projects. http://www.mekarn.org/msc2003-05/miniprojects/webpage/luyen.htm
Minitab 2000 GLM. In Minitab reference manual Release 13.31 for window. Minitab Inc., State College, USA.
Ogle R B 2006 Forages for pigs: nutritional, physiological and practical implications. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August 2006. Article #1 Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/ogle.htm
Pham Sy Tiep, Nguyen Van Luc, Trinh Quang Tuyen, Nguyen Manh Hung and Tran Van Tu 2006 Study on the use of Alocasiamacrorrhiza(roots and leaves) in diets for crossbred growing pigs under mountainous village conditions in northern Vietnam. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August 2006. Article # 11. Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/tiep.htm
Preston T R 2006 Forages as protein sources for pigs in the tropics. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August 2006. Article #2 Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/preston.htm
Rodríguez L, Lopez D, Preston T R and Peters K 2006a New Cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) leaves as partial replacement for soya bean meal in sugar cane juice diets for growing pigs. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August 2006. Article # 16. Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/rodr1.htm
Rodríguez L, Peniche I and Preston T R 2006b Digestibility and nitrogen balance in growing pigs fed a diet of sugar cane juice and fresh leaves of New Cocoyam (Xanthosomasagittifolium) as partial or complete replacement for soybean protein. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August 2006. Article # 16. Retrieved , from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/rodr2.htm
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154
Van Keulen and Young 1977 Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies..Journal of Animal Science 44:262-266 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/44/2/282
Varel V H and Pond W G 1985 Enumeration and activity of cellulolytic bacteria from gestating swine fed various levels of dietary fiber. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 49: 858-862