Citation of this paper |
The
effect of dietary energy (high and low) and Leucena leaf meal (LLM) levels (at
0 - 20%) on the performance of growing layers was studied using 24 pullets in a
digestibility trial and 288 birds aged 12 weeks in a growth study.
The crude
protein and crude fibre of LLM were 20.6 and 18.9%, respectively, whereas NFE was only 34.6%.
LLM contained about 16.5 MJ/kg DM Gross energy and 1.9% mimosine in DM. Increasing LLM led
to a reduction in most of the parameters measured with the exception of gizzard
weights, large intestine length and age at first egg. Plasma glucose
concentrations were not affected by treatment, while total plasma proteins
fluctuated inconsistently.
This
study showed that LLM at 5% had no adverse effect on performance of growing
layers but higher inclusion levels affected performance regardless of the
dietary energy level.
In many parts of the tropics and subtropics,
availability of animal and vegetable protein sources for poultry feeds is
unreliable. This has led to a growing need to find
locally available substitutes including forages from protein-rich leguminous
shrubs such as Leucaena leucocephala
and Gliricidia sepium (Leng 1997). These forages are also valuable
sources of minerals and vitamins (McDonald et al 1995). Leucaena
leucocephala is a tropical legume cultivated extensively in South East
Asia, Latin America, Africa and the West Indies (Lulandala 1985). The leaves,
young stems, flowers and pods are excellent sources of protein and minerals.
Leaf material of Leucaena compares favourably with Lucerne in terms of crude
protein (CP), calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), and it is also a good source of
b-carotene. Under optimum growing conditions, Leucaena yield large amounts of high quality forage (NAP 1984).
However, despite its nutritive and agronomic advantages, Leucaena contains a tyrosine analogue non-protein amino acid, mimosine (C8H10N2O4), which may be harmful to animals, including poultry (Jones and Megarrity 1983). Leucaena has also very low apparent metabolisable energy which ranges from 2.2 to 2.8 MJ/kg (D'Mello and Acamovic 1982a) associated with the presence of galactomannan gums (Lyon and Kohler 1981). Since birds eat to satisfy their energy requirements, the inclusion of Leucaena in their feed requires formulations geared at providing sufficient available energy to sustain production and at the same time avoid nutrient wastage and impaired productivity. These factors have not been optimised for poultry. Therefore the present studies were conducted to determine the nutritive value of Leucaena and effects of including Leucaena in diets differing in energy levels, on the performance of growing pullets.
Eight
treatments were used in two experiments conducted in this study. Leucaena leaf meal (LLM) was added at
0, 5, 10, and 20% of the diets (Table 1). In addition there was optimum (T; 2600-2800 kcal) and high
(H; 3000 kcal) dietary energy. In order
to achieve the high energy level, sunflower vegetable oil was added to the H
diets. All diets contained equal levels of vitamins and mineral premixes.
Table 1.
Ingredient composition of the experimental diets, %
|
||||||||
Ingredients |
H 0 |
H 5 |
H 10 |
H 20 |
T 0 |
T 5 |
T 10 |
T 20 |
LLM |
0 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
Maize meal |
65 |
65 |
65 |
65 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
Maize
bran |
4.5 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
4.5 |
27.5 |
32.5 |
32.5 |
27.5 |
Fish meal |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Sunflower |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
Vegetable oil |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Study I was a
digestibility trial conducted for a period of 36 days with the aim of
determining the nutritive value of different diets containing varying
combinations of LLM and energy in growing pullets. A 4x2 completely
randomised factorial design was used involving eight dietary treatments, three
experimental periods (week 14, 16 and 18 of age) and three birds per diet. At
the end of each week, faeces from one bird were combined, weighed and
thoroughly mixed. A small fresh sample was frozen for nitrogen analysis and the
remaining sample was dried at 62°C for 48 h, then finely ground
and packed in airtight containers for further analyses. During the period of
data collection, feed intake was also recorded daily.
Study II was a 12 weeks
growth experiment aimed at determining the effect of LLM and dietary energy
content on the performance of growing pullets. A complete randomised 4x2
factorial arrangement was used, comprising 8 dietary treatments; each treatment
was replicated three times with 12 birds per replicate. The 12 birds in each group were
placed in a 120cm x 120cm pen and group fed.
Birds were individually weighed once a week throughout the experimental
period. The feed conversion ratio was calculated by dividing the total feed
intake by total gain of all the birds in each pen.
From week 13 to 22, about 2 ml of blood samples/bird
were taken weekly from the brachial vein of four birds in each pen and
preserved in Na2EDTA tubes containing NaF. Plasma samples obtained
were stored at –20oC for glucose and total protein assays.
At 16, 18, 20, and 23 weeks of age, one bird per pen
was randomly picked and slaughtered to assess the carcass and organ
characteristics. The entire gastro-intestinal tract (GIT) was removed,
stretched and measured. The lengths of the oesophagus, duodenum, ileum, caeca
and large intestines were expressed as a percentage of the total GIT length.
The gizzards were also incised emptied and weighed. Other organs weighed
included the heart, liver, ovaries and spleen and were expressed as a
percentage of the total carcass weight. Counting the number of growing
follicles was used to assess follicular growth.
Analyses
of diets and faecal samples were carried out using the proximate method (AOAC
1990) for percentage dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), ether extract
(EE), crude fibre (CF), Ca and P contents. Uric acid nitrogen and faecal
nitrogen were measured using a direct chemical method described by Ekman (1954).
Ca and P were measured using an ion
selective Ion 83 electrode and Hitachi model spectrophotometer (100-20 Japan),
respectively.
Plasma glucose and total proteins were measured using
respective kits supplied by Randox Laboratories, UK. Mimosine concentration in
LLM, diets and faecal samples were measured against the mimosine standard
(Sigma) as described by Matsumoto and Sherman (1951). Mimosine was expressed as
a percentage of DM. Mimosine load was calculated by the difference between the
amount consumed and amount excreted in faeces at different ages.
The treatment effects on various parameters were
analysed by the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Statistical Analysis
Systems (SAS 1988) using a two way Analysis of Variance. Values were only considered to be significant at
P<0.05.
The CF content was highest in sunflower meal and lowest in
fish meal (Table 2). LLM had lower CF when compared to sunflower meal. The CP was highest
in fish meal and lowest in maize meal but was almost similar in both sunflower
seed cake meal and Leucaena leaf meal (LLM). The dry matter content did not
vary significantly between feed ingredients (ranging between 95.0% and 89.7%).
EE was highest and lowest in maize meal and sunflower meal, respectively. Ca
and P levels were highest in fish meal. Sunflower meal had the highest gross
energy content.
Table 2. Proximate composition of some ingredients used in diet formulation (% in DM except for gross energy) |
||||
Component |
LLM |
Maize meal |
Sunflower seed cake meal |
Fishmeal |
Crude fiber |
19.0 |
2.58 |
32.5 |
3.46 |
Crude protein |
20.6 |
9.15 |
21.2 |
59.0 |
Ash |
14.7 |
1.48 |
4.25 |
21.5 |
Ether extract |
5.46 |
4.57 |
15.9 |
14.5 |
Nitrogen free extract |
34.6 |
71.5 |
20,9 |
- |
GE, MJ/Kg DM |
16.5 |
15.4 |
19.3 |
17.5 |
Mimosine |
1.89 |
|
|
|
Ca |
0.75 |
0.34 |
0.96 |
4.25 |
P |
0.10 |
0.84 |
0.40 |
2.04 |
Table
3 shows the chemical composition of the compounded treatment diets. The DM
content did not differ significantly between the treatment diets The CP content
was lowest in the H5 diet, and was almost similar in the other diets. Decreases
in CF and EE levels with increasing LLM were observed in all diets. There was
no definite trend for ash and NFE in both optimum and high-energy diets.
Increase in LLM in diets reduced Ca and P in both the high and optimum energy
diets. The gross energy values were highest in T0 and lowest in H10 diets.
Table 3. Proximate chemical composition of the
experimental diets |
||||||||
Component |
Diet, % |
|||||||
H 0 |
H 5 |
H 10 |
H 20 |
T 0 |
T 5 |
T 10 |
T 20 |
|
Dry matter |
91.7 |
91.1 |
91.2 |
91.3 |
91.0 |
91.3 |
91.1 |
91.1 |
Crude protein |
12.9 |
8.4 |
12.0 |
13.0 |
13.1 |
12.8 |
13.1 |
13.0 |
Crude fibre |
8.3 |
6.2 |
5.6 |
5.4 |
9.0 |
8.2 |
5.8 |
5.8 |
Ether extract |
10.0 |
9.1 |
8.5 |
7.3 |
9.6 |
8.6 |
7.2 |
7.9 |
Ash |
5.8 |
5.3 |
6.9 |
7.6 |
6.1 |
6.6 |
6.9 |
7.0 |
N-Free extract |
54.7 |
62.1 |
58.3 |
57.9 |
53.3 |
55.0 |
58.2 |
57.5 |
Calcium |
1.0 |
1.1 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Phosphorus |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.20 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
Mimosine, % of DM |
- |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
- |
0.3 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
Gross energy, MJ/KgDM |
16.4 |
16.3 |
15.6 |
16.0 |
16.5 |
15.93 |
15.9 |
15.8 |
H= High energy; T = Optimum energy; 0, 5, 10 and 20% are LLM
levels |
LLM mimosine concentration was 0.4 mg/g (1.9% DM). A significant (P<0.05) increase in mimosine with increasing levels of LLM in the diets was observed (Table 3). The amount of mimosine per g of diet consumed and faeces voided, increased with increasing levels of LLM in both T and H diets at all sampling periods (Table 4). Similarly, in T diets the mimosine load increased as the level of LLM was increased, but changes were inconsistent in birds fed H diets. At 14 weeks of age, dietary treatment did not significantly affect the amount of mimosine excreted. However, increase in LLM in diets led to significant increases in the amount of mimosine excreted in the faeces during the 16th and 18th weeks of age.
With the exception of digestible crude protein, digestible nutrients
(DM, CF and EE) were found to decrease with increasing levels of LLM (Table 5).
Table 4. Dietary and faecal
mimosine content and mimosine load in the birds fed LLM-based diets |
|||||||
Age (weeks) |
Dietary
mimosine content, % in DM |
||||||
H 5 |
H 10 |
H 20 |
T 5 |
T 10 |
T 20 |
||
14 |
0.31 |
0.46 |
0.60 |
0.17 |
0.46 |
0.89 |
|
16 |
0.30 |
0.38 |
0.51 |
0.17 |
0.40 |
0.74 |
|
18 |
0.29 |
0.40 |
0.53 |
0.17 |
0.34 |
0.58 |
|
Faecal mimosine content,
% in DM |
|||||||
14 |
0.17 |
0.27 |
0.32 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.31 |
|
16 |
0.23 |
0.34 |
0.48 |
0.13 |
0.29 |
0.38 |
|
18 |
0.17 |
0.32 |
0.39 |
0.16 |
0.24 |
0.36 |
|
Mimosine load, % DM |
|||||||
14 |
0.14 |
0.19 |
0.29 |
0.01 |
0.26 |
0.57 |
|
16 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.11 |
0.35 |
|
18 |
0.12 |
0.08 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.22 |
|
Table 5. Mean values (with SEM) for digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DDM), crude fibre (DCF), crude protein (DCP) and ether extract (DEE) |
||||
|
DDM |
DCF |
DCP |
DEE |
H 0 |
66.8±
0.85a |
0.99±
0.04ab |
12.4±
0.06ab |
9.26±
0.11a |
H 5 |
68.7±
1.28a |
0.73±
0.11b |
7.77±
0.06f |
8.19±
0.09c |
H 10 |
64.9±
1.34ab |
0.87±
0.15ab |
11.3±
0.06e |
7.26±
0.07e |
H 20 |
64.3±
0.71abc |
0.96±
0.19ab |
12.1±
0.04cd |
5.96±
0.17g |
T 0 |
61.9±
3.86abc |
1.56±
0.76ab |
12.5±
0.13a |
8.76±
0.19b |
T 5 |
62.9±
2.10abc |
1.81±
0.47a |
12.2±
0.06bcd |
7.69±
0.12d |
T 10 |
61.7±
2.10bc |
0.56±
0.23b |
12.2±
0.10bc |
6.00±
0.07g |
T 20 |
59.5±
1.13c |
0.79±
0.06ab |
12.1±
0.14d |
6.40±
0.12f |
abcdefg Means in the same column without superscript in common are not different at P>0.05 |
Inclusion of LLM
induced yellow coloration of plasma and shanks of the birds. Depth of colour
was highest in birds fed the 20% LLM diets and palest in birds fed the 0% LLM
diets. The growth rates of birds declined
consistently as the LLM levels increased in the diet (Table 6). The highest overall gain
was observed in birds fed the optimum energy 0% LLM diet (T 0) and lowest in
birds fed the high-energy 20% LLM diet (H 20).
Table 6.
The effect of dietary treatment on mean weekly gain, daily feed intake and feed
conversion ratio |
||||||||
Age weeks |
H 0 |
H 5 |
H 10 |
H 20 |
T 0 |
T 5 |
T 10 |
T 20 |
Mean weekly body
weight gain, gm |
||||||||
13 |
116±20.5 |
116±12 |
99±7.4 |
71±17.6 |
112±8.8 |
85±3.8 |
113±29.7 |
66±14.8 |
15 |
76±5.7 |
79±3.7 |
71±8.1 |
15±2.1 |
133±6.5 |
88±2.7 |
79±2.5 |
66±8.1 |
17 |
44±2.5 |
45±6.2 |
53±12.0 |
34±5.3 |
50±6.4 |
55±6.5 |
53±8.9 |
45±2.4 |
19 |
74±8.6 |
81±8.1 |
52±2.8 |
17±8.1 |
59±7.9 |
37±6.3 |
21±12.7 |
-0.5±0.8 |
21 |
47±9.8 |
27±6.5 |
21±4.2 |
42±7.7 |
82±9.3 |
72±7.5 |
42±11.2 |
52±6.6 |
23 |
60±6.5 |
16±5.6 |
35±1.7 |
11±2.7 |
71±25.0 |
38±13.1 |
17±5.5 |
39±8.2 |
Final LW, g |
787±51 |
703±35 |
607±30 |
420±33 |
840±45 |
749±29 |
662±40 |
495±45 |
Average daily feed intake per bird, gm |
||||||||
13 |
55±1.3 |
56±2.4 |
55±0.9 |
51±1.6 |
59±1.4 |
57±2.0 |
59±1.1 |
54±3.2 |
15 |
57±1.8 |
65±2.9 |
56±1.6 |
47±0.5 |
59±2.9 |
65±1.5 |
68±1.9 |
63±5.4 |
17 |
58±1.4 |
65±2.7 |
50±1.2 |
45±0.7 |
61±2.4 |
67±2.5 |
67±1.1 |
67±4.4 |
19 |
63±2.2 |
65±6.6 |
55±4.8 |
47±5.2 |
66±2.2 |
67±2.3 |
62±2.3 |
63±4.0 |
21 |
53±2.7 |
55±4.6 |
49±5.1 |
48±3.8 |
69±1.5 |
68±1.9 |
60±1.2 |
60±2.4 |
23 |
73±3.6 |
64±2.1 |
57±3.5 |
61±5.0 |
80±3.6 |
72±3.8 |
72±1.4 |
71±4.4 |
Effect of experimental diet on feed
conversion ratio |
||||||||
13 |
0.49±0.07 |
0.49±0.03 |
0.56±0.03 |
0.82±0.22 |
0.52±0.05 |
0.67±0.04 |
0.58±0.12 |
0.82±0.12 |
15 |
0.76±0.04 |
0.83±0.01 |
0.80±0.08 |
3.1±0.38 |
0.44±0.18 |
0.73±0.04 |
0.86±0.04 |
0.97±0.04 |
17 |
1.34±0.1 |
1.50±0.19 |
0.99±0.19 |
1.36±0.17 |
1.29±0.20 |
1.25±0.15 |
1.26±0.29 |
1.51±0.18 |
19 |
0.86±0.06 |
0.83±0.15 |
1.06±0.05 |
2.76±0.13 |
1.14±0.11 |
1.81±0.26 |
2.95±1.2 |
n.a. |
21 |
1.12±0.49 |
2.03±2.5 |
2.63±0.67 |
1.16±0.12 |
0.84±0.08 |
0.95±0.09 |
1.43±0.45 |
1.15±0.41 |
23 |
1.21±0.02 |
4.00±0.29 |
1.58±0.14 |
5.55±0.32 |
3.12±0.62 |
1.89±0.78 |
4.23±0.11 |
1.84±0.36 |
Overall feed intake decreased with increasing LLM% at
both energy levels, the rate of decline being highest in birds given high
energy and high (20%) LLM diets. Feed intakes for all the diets were lowest at
weeks 16 and 20 of age and thereafter, increased markedly with age up to the 24th
week. Treatment and week interactions were significant (P<0.05).
Feed required per unit live weight gain (feed
conversion) increased with increasing LLM level in the
diets, at both energy levels. However, feed conversion ratio for birds fed 5
and 10% LLM in high-energy diets was similar. Correlation analysis between
feed conversion ratio (FCR) and gain showed a negative significant association
(r= -0.91, P<0.01)
Carcass weight
declined with increase in LLM (Table 7). The were no differences in carcass weight between energy
levels. The total
GIT length, lengths of the oesophagus, duodenum and ileum and weights of the
heart and ovaries (expressed as % of carcass weight) increased with age of
birds but these changes were not affected by dietary treatment.
The liver and gizzard weight were heavier in birds fed 10 and 20 % LLM diets.
Significant correlations (P<0.05) were observed between carcass and gizzard
weights, while the GIT showed significant (P<0.05) correlations with
oesophagus and large intestinal length. Neither treatment nor age of the bird
significantly affected caecal and large intestinal lengths. In contrast, there
was a significant treatment and age effect on the length of the proventriculus.
Age at first egg was 20, 21, 22, 24, 26 and 29 weeks
for birds fed H 0, T 0, H 5, T 5, H 10, T 10 and T 20 diets, respectively and greater
than 29 weeks for H 20-fed birds.
There was no
significant dietary effect or age effect on plasma glucose levels. Plasma
glucose in all birds ranged between 11 and 17.5 mMol. Mean plasma total protein levels varied between weeks in all
groups but the pattern of change was not consistent among treatments. The plasma total protein levels increased up
to week 16, followed by a sharp decline in week 17 and a slight increase in
weeks 18 and 19 for all dietary treatments.
The proximate and mineral composition of the feed
ingredients and LLM used in present studies were within the expected ranges
(Mtenga and Laswai 1994; McDonald et al 1995).
The mimosine concentration of 1.89% DM compares well with values reported for
Leucaena cultivars (D’Mello and Thomas 1978). The low momosine concentration in the compounded diets as
compared to levels in the LLM could have been due to the chemical binding of
mimosine with other nutrients in the feed. Energy values of 16.49 MJ/kg for LLM
observed in the present study were lower than the value of 18.3MJ/kg, reported
by Mtenga and Laswai (1994). Yellow shanks and plasma observed in birds fed
high LLM diets were probably associated with increased intakes of carotene,
present in high amounts (536 mg/kg) in LLM (NAP 1984; Lulandala 1985).
Lower growth rates in birds fed high-energy diets
compared to those fed optimum energy diets might be associated with imbalances
in ratios between energy and other nutrients, presence of toxic factors and
decreased feed intake. The addition of sunflower oil to increase dietary energy
might also have contributed to the lower growth rates, since Furuse et al (1992) showed that White
Leghorns fed long chain triglycerols had a decreased feed intake and eventually
lower body weight gain.
Progressive increase of LLM in the diets resulted in
parallel reductions in growth rates of birds. This was probably due to the
antinutritional effects of increased mimosine load and/or poor digestibility of
nutrients brought about by the high tannin and fibre fraction of the leaf meal
(Arora and Joshi 1986). Additionally, the lowest growth rates observed in birds
fed 20% LLM diets, especially those on the high-energy diet, could have been
due to low feed intake and the effect of mimosine. Hence, considering the
interactive effect of LLM and energy on body weight gain, performance was
better at lower LLM levels with high energy, whereas, at optimum energy levels
higher LLM levels were favourable.
Feed conversion ratios increased with increases in LLM
level in the diet, being highest in birds fed 20% LLM and lowest in birds fed
0% LLM for both optimum and high-energy diets. This could have been due to the
effects of mimosine and/or high CF. However, the similar feed conversion values
observed in birds fed the 5% LLM and 10% LLM high-energy diets in the present
study and other studies (Gloria et al 1966; Reddy et al 1995) indicate that
high energy probably alleviates the adverse effects of LLM.
In both optimum and high-energy diets, the carcass
weights decreased with increase in LLM, effects being greater in birds fed the
20% LLM high-energy diet. This was probably due to the reduced intake observed
in this group, an effect associated with the high fat content of this diet
(Isaaks 1963). The observed effects of Leucaena on carcass weights could be an
effect traceable to mimosine and the presence of tannin (NAP 1984).
Birds fed the 20% LLM diets had the longest GIT,
particularly at week 16 and 18. This could have been a physiological adaptive
process to increase surface area required for successful digestion and
absorption of the feed containing high crude fibre (Farouq and Odi 1994).
However, birds fed either optimum or high-energy diets containing 0% and 5% LLM
had longer proventriculus than those fed similar diets at 10% and 20% LLM
levels. The cause of this effect was not clear, but could probably be
associated with toxic effect of LLM, since mimosine is known to inhibit growth
and elongation of the proventriculus as well as its HCl and pepsin activity
(Austic and Nesheim 1990).
Increases in liver and gizzard weights with increasing
LLM for both energy levels indicate that Leucaena had an effect on these
organs. The changes in the liver may be related to the need of this organ to
increase its efficiency in detoxifying LLM-derived products, including mimosine
(Directo et al 1971) and for the gizzard to handle high fibre diets, resulting
from the inclusion of LLM and sunflower meal (Farouq and Odi 1994).
Birds fed low levels of LLM had low mean age at first
egg (20-22 weeks) whereas the lowest ovary weights and highest age at first egg
(29 weeks) were observed in birds fed 20% LLM at both energy levels. This
concurs with findings reported elsewhere that high dietary LLM levels delay
sexual maturity in birds. The present
studies also showed that birds fed different dietary energy and LLM levels
varied in age at first egg, indicating that dietary composition has a
significant effect on age at sexual maturity in birds (Upase et al 1994; Farouq
and Odi 1996).
Dietary treatments
induced minimum changes in plasma glucose concentrations, but increasing LLM in
diets up to 10% and 20% lowered the plasma protein levels in birds. Plasma
glucose levels were within normal levels of 12.79 to 17.36 mMol, as reported by
Bell and Freeman (1971). The lowering of plasma protein with increased LLM
content in the diets could have been due to reduced intake observed in these
birds and/or mimosine induced poor protein utilisation. Increasing mimosine concentrations in faeces (87-99%) with
increase in LLM at both energy levels is in agreement with D'Mello and Acamovic
(1982b) who noted about 92% excretion of ingested mimosine by chicks
fed LLM diets. Therefore, the deleterious effects observed on feeding LLM-based
diets in the present studies may not be wholly associated with mimosine alone.
The high dietary crude fibre content might have limited intake and dry matter
digestibility, thus causing imbalances in the availability of essential
nutrients.
The findings in the present study show that leucaena leaf meal could be used as a protein substitute at 5% in diets of growing birds. However, further studies to determine long-term effects of leucaena are recommended.
Arora
S K and Joshi U N 1986.
Lignification of Leucaena leaves during growth and its relationship with
mimosine content. Leucaena Research. Report. 7: 34 – 35.
Austic
R E and Neishem M C 1990.
Nutrient requirements for layers. In: Poultry Production, 13th
Edition. pp 213-221.
AOAC. 1990. Association of Agricultural Chemists Official
Methods of Analysis, 15th Edition, Arlington Virginia, USA pp
807-809.
Bell
D J and Freeman B M 1971
Plasma glucose levels, plasma protein levels and sexual maturity in chickens.
In: Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl. pp 1483.
Directo C C, Labadan M M and
Novilla M N 1971 Clinical pathological responses of SCWL cockerels fed with different
levels of ipil-ipil leaf meal.
Philippine Journal of Agricultural. Science.
8: 93-105
D’Mello
J P F and Thomas D 1978 The
nutritive value of dried Leucaena leaf meal from Malawi. Studies with young
chicks. Tropical Agriculture 5:45 –50
D’Mello J P F. and Acamovic T
1982a Apparent metabolizable energy value of dried Leucaena leaf meal for
young chicks. Tropical Agriculture. 59: 329-332
D’Mello J F P and Acamovic T
1982b
Growth performance and mimosine excretion by young chicks fed on Leucaena leucocephala . Animal Feed
Science and Technology. 7: 247 – 255
Ekman
K 1954. Faeces N determination
in poultry manure. Australian Journal of Chemistry. 7: 55.
Farouq
G A and Odi H D 1994. Effect
of varying calorie and protein levels on layers fed high levels of Leucaena
leaf meal. Poultry Science 73: 149-150.
Farouq G A and Odi H D 1996. Long term effect of
feeding Leucaena leaf meal on egg production. Poultry Science. 75: Supplement 1: Abstract 146
Furuse M, Mabayo R T, Kita K and Okumura J 1992 Effects of dietary
medium chain triglyceride on protein and energy utilisation in growing chicks.
British Poultry Science. 33: 49-57.
Gloria L A, GerparcioA L, Aglibut F B and Castillo L S
1966.
Leucaena glauca benth for poultry and livestock. III. Protein and energy levels
and minerals in minimising toxic effects of mimosine in chick rations. In:
Leguminous Leaf Meals in Non-ruminant Nutrition. (Editor: D'Mello J P F). pp
247-277.
Isaaks R E 1963 Fat digestion absorption and transport. In:
Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic
Fowl. (Editors: Bell D J and Freeman
B M) 1: 322.
Leng R A 1997 Tree foliage in ruminant nutrition
No 139:
http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w7448e/w7448e00.htm
Lulandala L L 1985 Intercropping
Leucaena leucocephala with maize and Beans. PhD Thesis, Sokoine University
of Agriculture Morogoro, Tanzania pp 3-6.
Lyon C K and Kohler G O 1981 Leaf Protein
concentrates from Leucaena leaves. Leucaena
Research Report 2: 81.
Matsumoto H and Sherman G D 1951 Archives of
.Biochemistry and Biophysics 33: 195.
McDonald P, Edwards R A and Greenhalgh J F D 1995. Animal Nutrition 5th Edition. Published by John Wiley
and Sons, United States pp 606.
Mtenga L A and Laswai G D 1994 Leucaena leucocephala as feed for rabbits and pigs: detailed chemical
composition and effect of level of inclusion on performance. Forest Ecology
Management 64: 249-257.
NAP 1984. National Academy Press. Innovations in Tropical
Reforestation. In Leucaena: Promising forage and tree crop for the tropics. 2nd
Edition Washington, pp 1-10; 41-51
Reddy S P V V, Ravindra R V, Ahmed N and Sharif S A
1995
Effect of feeding a based diet containing Leucaena
leucocephala seeds on chick performance. Nutrition Abstract 65: 4198.
SAS 1988 SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS
Institute Inc., pp 1028.
Upase B T and Jadhav A J 1994. Effect on subabu (Leucaena leucocephala) leaf meal feeding
on sexual maturity, feed and economical efficiency of growing layer
chicks. Poultry Advisor 27: 33-36.
Received 6 June 2003; Accepted 13 June 2003